Two selected claims need a closer look: one omits important context, and another has no usable evidence. A third matches the illustrative source. This sample shows how a reviewer can move from flags to the source excerpt.
Coverage describes evidence availability across selected claims, not the entire script. Missing evidence does not establish that a claim is false.
mixedSelected claim 1Confidence: 74%
Our example fund returned 8% last year.
In this illustrative example, the source reports a gross return. The claim omits the fee basis and the specific reporting period.
Illustrative excerpt: annual gross return 8%; holdings at period end: 40 securities. This is invented sample data, not a financial source.
No usable evidence foundSelected claim 2Confidence: Not assessed
The example strategy works in every market condition.
No usable evidence was found in this example. A broad performance statement requires more context and qualified review.
View evidence · 0 sources
No usable evidence was established for this claim. Any retrieved candidates below are provided for context, not as support.
Review checkmarks are a personal checklist saved in this browser. They are not a shared sign-off, approval, or part of the exported PDF.
⚠
Research tool - not legal or compliance advice
This report identifies factual claims and retrieves evidence from authoritative sources. It does not constitute legal advice or investment advice and does not guarantee regulatory compliance. It is not a substitute for qualified FINRA, SEC, or firm-specific compliance review. Flagged claims require review by a qualified compliance professional before publication.